ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2024
Comparative effectiveness of sildenafil citrate and estradiol valerate as adjuvants during clomiphene citrate-assisted ovarian stimulation cycles in patients with unexplained infertility: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the effect of sildenafil citrate and estradiol valerate as adjuvant therapy during ovarian stimulation cycles with clomiphene citrate in patients with unexplained infertility in Kisangani.
methodA double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted for two years at two specialized health facilities in Kisangani (University Clinics of Kisangani and "Clinique des Anges Kisangani"). The population included 148 patients, 74 of whom were on clomiphene citrate + sildenafil citrate (CCSC) regimens and 74 of whom were on clomiphene citrate + estradiol valerate (CCEV) regimens for three months. The primary indicator was the conception rate, with secondary outcomes encompassing endometrial thickness, appearance and vascularity, the number of mature follicles and ovulation rate.
resultsThe two groups were comparable in terms of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The mean duration of attempting to conceive was 4.39 years versus 4.36 years (P = 0.839), while the mean AFC was 11.51 versus 11.46 (P = 0.831), in the CCSC group versus CCEV group respectively. Secondary infertility was the most frequent diagnosis in each of the two groups. The biochemical pregnancy rate was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.385), while the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the CCSC group versus CCEV group (P = 0.04). Both perifollicular flow and the ovulation rate were significantly higher in the CCSC group versus the CCEV group (P = 0.006 and P = 0.002 respectively). However, endometrial vascularity/thickness, and the number of Graafian follicles were not significantly different between the two groups.
conclusionAs an adjuvant, sildenafil increases the rate of clinical pregnancy more than does estradiol in patients with unexplained infertility undergoing ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate. STUDY REGISTRATION: PACTR 202,310,849,449,401 (Pan African Clinical Trials Registry).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.