Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385265›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2024

Community-based palliative care needs and barriers to access among cancer patients in rural north India: a Participatory action research.

Mayank Gupta, Ankita Kankaria, Liya E Joshy, Sandeep Singh, Bhajan Lal, Subhash Choudhary, Sapna Marcus, Anju Grewal, Lajya Devi Goyal, Rakesh Kakkar

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mayank GuptaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India. drm_gupta@yahoo.co.in.
Ankita KankariaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Liya E JoshyProject Staff, C3PaC Project, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Sandeep SinghProject Staff, C3PaC Project, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Bhajan LalProject Staff, C3PaC Project, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Subhash ChoudharyProject Staff, C3PaC Project, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Sapna MarcusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Anju GrewalDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Lajya Devi GoyalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Rakesh KakkarDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper aimed to explore the palliative care (PC) needs and barriers to access among cancer patients in a rural region of North India with a high cancer burden.

methodsA Participatory action research (PAR) approach was employed. Situational assessment, community sensitization workshops (CSWs) and door-to-door surveys were planned, conducted and developed over three PAR cycles. A parallel convergent mixed-methods approach was adopted wherein the quantitative data from door-to-door surveys and qualitative data from CSWs and investigator field notes were collected and analyzed to provide a comprehensive understanding of PC needs and barriers to access. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used.

resultsA total of 27 CSWs involving 526 stakeholders were conducted. A total of 256 cancer patients were assessed for PC needs and symptom burden using the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators (SPICT-4ALL) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) tool, respectively. Based on the SPICT assessment, all patients (n = 256) satisfied general and/or cancer-specific indicators for PC. The majority (56.6%) had ≥ one moderate-severe symptom, with the most common symptoms being tiredness, pain and loss of appetite. Analysis of qualitative findings generated three themes: unmet needs, burden of caregiving, and barriers and challenges. Cancer affected all domains of patients' and their families' lives, contributing to biopsychosocial suffering. Social stigma, discrimination, sympathizing attitudes and lack of emotional and material support contributed to psychosocial suffering among cancer patients and their caregivers. Lack of awareness, nearby healthcare facilities, transportation, essential medicines, trained manpower and education in PC, collusion, fear of social discrimination, faulty perceptions and misconceptions about cancer made access to PC difficult.

conclusionsThe study emphasize the need for and provide a roadmap for developing context-specific and culturally appropriate CBPC services to address the identified challenges and needs. The findings point towards education of CHWs in PC; improving community awareness about cancer, PC, government support schemes; ensuring an uninterrupted supply of essential medicines; and developing active linkages within the community and with NGOs to address the financial, transportation, educational, vocational and other social needs as some of the strategies to ensure holistic CBPC services.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2023/04/051357).

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsPalliative CareRural PopulationAdultAgedCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerCommunityNorth IndiaPalliative careParticipatory action researchRural

Identifiers

PMID39385265
PMCPMC11462709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.