Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385243›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2024

DNA demethylation triggers cell free DNA release in colorectal cancer cells.

Valeria Pessei, Marco Macagno, Elisa Mariella, Noemi Congiusta, Vittorio Battaglieri, Paolo Battuello, Marco Viviani, Giulia Gionfriddo, Simona Lamba, Annalisa Lorenzato and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Valeria Pessei *Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Marco Macagno *Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Elisa MariellaDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Noemi CongiustaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Vittorio BattaglieriDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Paolo BattuelloDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Marco VivianiCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Giulia GionfriddoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Simona LambaDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Annalisa LorenzatoDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Daniele OddoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Fariha IdreesCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro CavaliereCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Alice BartoliniCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Simonetta GuarreraCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Michael LinnebacherClinic of General Surgery, Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, UMR, Rostock, Germany.
Laura MonteonofrioDepartment of Research and Advanced Technologies, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luca CardoneDepartment of Research and Advanced Technologies, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Michele MilellaSection of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona and Verona University and Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Andrea BertottiCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Silvia SodduDepartment of Research and Advanced Technologies, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Elena GrassiCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni CrisafulliIFOM, the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BardelliDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Ludovic BaraultCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy. ludovic.barault@gmail.com.
Federica Di NicolantonioCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy. federica.dinicolantonio@unito.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiquid biopsy based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis holds significant promise as a minimally invasive approach for the diagnosis, genotyping, and monitoring of solid malignancies. Human tumors release cfDNA in the bloodstream through a combination of events, including cell death, active and passive release. However, the precise mechanisms leading to cfDNA shedding remain to be characterized. Addressing this question in patients is confounded by several factors, such as tumor burden extent, anatomical and vasculature barriers, and release of nucleic acids from normal cells. In this work, we exploited cancer models to dissect basic mechanisms of DNA release.

methodsWe measured cell loss ratio, doubling time, and cfDNA release in the supernatant of a colorectal cancer (CRC) cell line collection (N = 76) representative of the molecular subtypes previously identified in cancer patients. Association analyses between quantitative parameters of cfDNA release, cell proliferation, and molecular features were evaluated. Functional experiments were performed to test the impact of modulating DNA methylation on cfDNA release.

resultsHigher levels of supernatant cfDNA were significantly associated with slower cell cycling and increased cell death. In addition, a higher cfDNA shedding was found in non-CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) models. These results indicate a positive correlation between lower methylation and increased cfDNA levels. To explore this further, we exploited methylation microarrays to identify a subset of probes significantly associated with cfDNA shedding and derive a methylation signature capable of discriminating high from low cfDNA releasers. We applied this signature to an independent set of 176 CRC cell lines and patient derived organoids to select 14 models predicted to be low or high releasers. The methylation profile successfully predicted the amount of cfDNA released in the supernatant. At the functional level, genetic ablation of DNA methyl-transferases increased chromatin accessibility and DNA fragmentation, leading to increased cfDNA release in isogenic CRC cell lines. Furthermore, in vitro treatment of five low releaser CRC cells with a demethylating agent was able to induce a significant increase in cfDNA shedding.

conclusionsMethylation status of cancer cell lines contributes to the variability of cfDNA shedding in vitro. Changes in methylation pattern are associated with cfDNA release levels and might be exploited to increase sensitivity of liquid biopsy assays.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsColorectal NeoplasmsDNA DemethylationBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCpG IslandsDNA MethylationHumansBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCell cycleCell deathcfDNAColorectal cancerDNA methylationLiquid biopsyMSI

Identifiers

PMID39385243
PMCPMC11462661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.