Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385232›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2024

Treatment patterns and patient journey in progressive pulmonary fibrosis: a cross-sectional survey.

Nazia Chaudhuri, Paolo Spagnolo, Claudia Valenzuela, Valeria C Amatto, Oliver-Thomas Carter, Lauren Lee, Mark Small, Michael Kreuter

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis: the importance of identification and intervention.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nazia ChaudhuriFaculty of Life and Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Ulster University, Magee Campus, Londonderry, UK. nazia.chaudhuri@nhs.net.
Paolo SpagnoloRespiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Claudia ValenzuelaILD Unit, Pulmonology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Valeria C AmattoTA Inflammation Med, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Oliver-Thomas CarterAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Lauren LeeAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Mark SmallAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Michael KreuterMainz Center for Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pneumology ZfT, Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Mainz University Medical Center, Marienhaus Clinic Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Michael.Kreuter@marienhaus.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) presenting with a progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) phenotype, current knowledge of disease characteristics at diagnosis, patient journey, and treatment is limited. This study aimed to describe demographics and clinical experiences of patients presenting with PPF in a European real-world setting.

methodsData were analysed from the Adelphi Real World PPF-ILD Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of pulmonologists and rheumatologists in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom) and internal medicine specialists (France) from April to October 2022. Physicians provided data for up to 12 consecutive patients with physician-confirmed ILD with a progressive phenotype other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Analyses were descriptive.

resultsOverall, 265 physicians reported on 1,335 patients. Mean (standard deviation) age at survey date was 60.4 (11.6) years, 91.2% were white, 58.1% female, 44.0% non-smokers. Most patients (63.3%) first consulted a primary care physician. There was a mean delay of 7.8 (22.7) months between first ILD symptom and healthcare professional visit, and another 7.7 (12.8) months to ILD diagnosis. At survey date, 47.7% of patients had physician-reported moderate ILD, 42.3% had mild ILD and 10.0% had severe ILD. Disease progression was reported in the 12 months prior to the survey for 19.5% of patients; of these, progression was based on worsening symptom in 27.3% and lung function decline in 25.8%. For patients experiencing symptoms prior to ILD diagnosis (72.8%), the most common symptoms were dyspnoea on exertion (80.5%) and cough (57.8%). Overall, 17.4% of patients were misdiagnosed prior to ILD diagnosis, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease suspected in 39.2% of them. The most frequent comorbidities were anxiety (16.9%) and gastroesophageal reflux (15.5%). Although 77.8% of patients were receiving treatment for ILD at survey date, 15.6% of patients had never been prescribed treatment for ILD.

conclusionsThis real-world study expands our understanding of patients, diagnostic delays and treatment gaps experienced by patients diagnosed with PPF in Europe. There was a mean delay of 15.5 months between first ILD symptoms and ILD diagnosis. Given the progressive nature of PPF, diagnostic delay may lead to poor outcomes, including shorter survival.

trial registrationN/a.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary FibrosisSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAntifibroticsDiagnosisInterstitial lung diseaseMarket researchPatient journeyProgressive pulmonary fibrosisPulmonary fibrosisReal-world dataSurveyTreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID39385232
PMCPMC11465623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.