Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385226›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Plasma metabolomics profiles and breast cancer risk.

Hui-Chen Wu, Yunjia Lai, Yuyan Liao, Maya Deyssenroth, Gary W Miller, Regina M Santella, Mary Beth Terry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The plasma proteome and breast cancer risk.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hui-Chen WuDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA. hw2057@cumc.columbia.edu.
Yunjia LaiDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Yuyan LiaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Maya DeyssenrothDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Gary W MillerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Regina M SantellaDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Mary Beth TerryHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Steven N. Chillrud · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
Core-001U01CA164920 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Irene Andrulis, Sarah Violet Colonna · 2018 to 2026
$17.0M
NCI NIH HHS 2U01CA164920-11NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164920NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and incidence rates are increasing; metabolomics may be a promising approach for identifying the drivers of the increasing trends that cannot be explained by changes in known BC risk factors.

methodsWe conducted a nested case-control study (median followup 6.3 years) within the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) (n = 40 cases and 70 age-matched controls). We conducted a metabolome-wide association study using untargeted metabolomics coupling hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and C

resultsWe found eight metabolic features associated with BC risk. For the four metabolites negatively associated with risk, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 0.31 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14, 0.66) (L-Histidine) to 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.98) (N-Acetylgalactosamine), and for the four metabolites positively associated with risk, ORs ranged from 1.61 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.51, (m/z: 101.5813, RT: 90.4, 1,3-dibutyl-1-nitrosourea, a potential carcinogen)) to 2.20 (95% CI: 1.15, 4.23) (11-cis-Eicosenic acid). These results were no longer statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Adding the BC-related metabolic features to a model, including age, the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) risk score improved the accuracy of BC prediction from an area under the curve (AUC) of 66% to 83%.

conclusionsIf replicated in larger prospective cohorts, these findings offer promising new ways to identify exposures related to BC and improve BC risk prediction.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMetabolomicsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansMetabolomeMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorBOADICEABreast cancer epidemiologyMetabolomeMetabolomicsNested case–control studyPartial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)

Identifiers

PMID39385226
PMCPMC11463119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.