Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385211›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024

Predicting 3-month poor functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke in young patients using machine learning.

Lamia Mbarek, Siding Chen, Aoming Jin, Yuesong Pan, Xia Meng, Xiaomeng Yang, Zhe Xu, Yong Jiang, Yongjun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lamia MbarekDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Siding ChenDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Aoming JinDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuesong PanDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xia MengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaomeng YangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhe XuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yong JiangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. jiangyong@ncrcnd.org.cn.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. yongjunwang@ncrcnd.org.cn.

Funding

Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2020-1-2041Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2019-I2M-5-029National Natural Science Foundation of China U20A20358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction of short-term outcomes in young patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may assist in making therapy decisions. Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in healthcare due to its high accuracy. This study aims to use a ML-based predictive model for poor 3-month functional outcomes in young AIS patients and to compare the predictive performance of ML models with the logistic regression model.

methodsWe enrolled AIS patients aged between 18 and 50 years from the Third Chinese National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III), collected between 2015 and 2018. A modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥ 3 was a poor functional outcome at 3 months. Four ML tree models were developed: The extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosted Machine (lightGBM), Random Forest (RF), and The Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT), compared with logistic regression. We assess the model performance based on both discrimination and calibration.

resultsA total of 2268 young patients with a mean age of 44.3 ± 5.5 years were included. Among them, (9%) had poor functional outcomes. The mRS at admission, living alone conditions, and high National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at discharge remained independent predictors of poor 3-month outcomes. The best AUC in the test group was XGBoost (AUC = 0.801), followed by GBDT, RF, and lightGBM (AUCs of 0.795, 0, 794, and 0.792, respectively). The XGBoost, RF, and lightGBM models were significantly better than logistic regression (P < 0.05).

conclusionsML outperformed logistic regression, where XGBoost the boost was the best model for predicting poor functional outcomes in young AIS patients. It is important to consider living alone conditions with high severity scores to improve stroke prognosis.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeMachine LearningAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesYoung AdultAcute ischemic strokeMachine learningPoor functional outcomesYoung patients

Identifiers

PMID39385211
PMCPMC11466038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.