ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Myocardial strain analysis by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance to identify subclinical cardiac dysfunction in patients with MINOCA.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strain Echocardiography in MINOCA: Diagnostic and Follow-Up Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate whether feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) can identify subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA).
methodsClinical data and CMR images of MINOCA patients (N = 46) and control individuals (N = 12) were compared. The infarct and edema volume to total myocardium, peak global longitudinal strain (GLS), global longitudinal strain rate (GLSR), peak global circumferential strain (GCS), global circumferential strain rate, peak global radial strain, and global radial strain rate were measured. Diagnostic performances of strain parameters for MINOCA were evaluated by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analysis.
resultsExcept smoking history, the two groups showed no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factors and traditional heart function. GLS (-14.67 ± 1.96% vs. -19.19 ± 2.05%), GLSR (-0.94 ± 0.16 S
conclusionsMyocardial strain by FT-CMR may effectively detect early myocardial impairment with MINOCA, especially in patients with normal routine MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.