Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385141›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2024

Immune modulatory effects of tulathromycin, gamithromycin, and oxytetracycline in cattle.

W Wheat, L Chow, K Still-Brooks, R Moore-Foster, J Herman, R Hunter, F Garry, S Dow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

W WheatCenter for Immune Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, and, Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. William.Wheat@colostate.edu.
L ChowCenter for Immune Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, and, Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
K Still-BrooksCenter for Immune Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, and, Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
R Moore-FosterCenter for Immune Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, and, Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
J HermanCenter for Immune Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, and, Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
R HunterHunter Cattle Co, Wheatland, WY, USA.
F GarryCenter for Immune Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, and, Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
S DowCenter for Immune Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, and, Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. sdow@colostate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain classes of antibiotics, including tetracyclines and macrolides, are known to exert immune suppressive effects in other species but the immune modulatory effects of these antibiotics have not been previously studied in cattle. To address this question, we investigated the effects of oxytetracycline, gamithromycin, and tulathromycin on T cell and macrophage responses to activation, using in vitro assays. In addition, we assessed the impact of these antibiotics on T cell responses in vivo following treatment of healthy cattle with currently recommended doses of each of the three antibiotics. We found that all 3 antibiotics markedly suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro at relevant therapeutic drug concentrations and significantly suppressed macrophage activation responses to LPS. In cattle treated with a single dose of each antibiotic, we observed significant suppression of T cell proliferation and cytokine production beginning as early as 6 h after administration, with increasing immune suppression observed at 48 h. Taken together, these results indicate that commonly used antibiotics in cattle exert significant immune modulatory activity, in addition to their antimicrobial activity. These off-target effects should be considered when using antibiotics for prophylaxis or metaphylaxis in high-risk dairy or beef cattle (192 words).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDisaccharidesHeterocyclic CompoundsOxytetracyclineAnimalsCattleCell ProliferationCytokinesFemaleMacrolidesMacrophagesT-LymphocytesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCytokinesDisaccharidesgamithromycinHeterocyclic CompoundsMacrolidesOxytetracyclinetulathromycinCytokinesLymphocytesMacrophagesMetaphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID39385141
PMCPMC11462805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.