SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Effect of pneumonia on the outcomes of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of emphysema on biomarkers in hospitalized COPD patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Bacterial Pneumonia and Acute Kidney Injury: Association and Impact on Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in the United States.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2026Article
- Free erythrocyte protoporphyrin fluorescence as an underrecognized prognostic marker of mortality in community-acquired pneumonia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the effect of pneumonia on the risk of mortality and other clinical outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).
methodsPubMed, EMBASE and Scopus were screened for observational cohort and case-control studies that reported outcomes in AECOPD patients with and without pneumonia. Pooled effect sizes were reported as relative risks (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) for categorical outcomes and as weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were risk of admission to intensive care unit (ICU), need for assisted ventilation and readmission as well as duration of stay at the hospital. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
resultsThirteen studies were included. AECOPD patients with pneumonia had significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.40, 3.73), mortality at 1 month (RR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.09, 3.13), and 1 year or more of follow-up (HR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.15, 4.61) compared to AECOPD patients without pneumonia. Pneumonia was associated with significantly higher risk of admission to ICU (RR 2.79, 95% CI: 1.47, 5.28), need for assisted ventilation (RR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.52, 2.67), and longer hospital stay (in days) (WMD 3.31, 95% CI: 2.33, 4.29). The risk of readmission was comparable in the two groups of patients (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.19). The overall quality of evidence for the outcomes was judged to be "Low".
conclusionPneumonia during acute exacerbation of COPD may lead to increases in both short-term and long-term mortality as well as increased hospital stay, need for ventilatory support and admission to ICU. Our findings suggest the need for close monitoring, early intervention, and long-term follow-up, to improve the outcomes in AECOPD patients with concurrent pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.