ArticleBMC nursing2024
The relationship between moral distress and clinical care quality among nurses: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Moral Distress, Professional Burnout, and Potential Staff Turnover in Intensive Care Nursing Practice in Latvia-Phase 1.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses constitute the largest group of service providers in the healthcare system and significantly influence the quality of healthcare services. Factors such as ethical considerations may be related to the quality of care. This study aimed to determine the relationship between moral distress and the quality of clinical care among nurses working in Gonabad, Iran.
methodsAn analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 252 nurses working in emergency, internal medicine, surgery, psychiatry, critical care and maternity wards at Allameh Bohlool Hospital from May to July 2023. This research used demographic information questionnaire, the revised Moral Distress Scale (MDS-R), and the Quality Patient Care Scale (QUALPAC). The significance level for the study was set at p < 0.05.
resultsThere was a significant relationship between the frequency of moral distress and the quality of clinical care (p = 0.032), as well as between the intensity of moral distress and the quality of clinical care (p = 0.043). Nurses who experienced moral distress more frequently and intensely provided better quality care. However, there was no significant relationship between the effect of moral distress and the quality of clinical care (r = 0.032, p = 0.619). Additionally, a significant statistical relationship was found between the intensity of moral distress and the physical dimension of clinical care quality (r = 0.171, p = 0.007), indicating that increased moral distress intensity was associated with higher quality of physical care.
conclusionsNurses who experience higher levels of moral distress, both in terms of frequency and intensity, perform better in the care they provide and deliver it in the best possible manner, particularly in the physical dimension of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.