ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Accelerated muscle mass estimation from CT images through transfer learning.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal Muscle Mass Estimation from Lower Leg Digital Images Using Machine Learning.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Images Versus Videos in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Computer-Aided Diagnosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Tomato seedling stem and leaf segmentation method based on an improved ResNet architecture.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe cost of labeling to collect training data sets using deep learning is especially high in medical applications compared to other fields. Furthermore, due to variances in images depending on the computed tomography (CT) devices, a deep learning based segmentation model trained with a certain device often does not work with images from a different device.
methodsIn this study, we propose an efficient learning strategy for deep learning models in medical image segmentation. We aim to overcome the difficulties of segmentation in CT images by training a VNet segmentation model which enables rapid labeling of organs in CT images with the model obtained by transfer learning using a small number of manually labeled images, called SEED images. We established a process for generating SEED images and conducting transfer learning a model. We evaluate the performance of various segmentation models such as vanilla UNet, UNETR, Swin-UNETR and VNet. Furthermore, assuming a scenario that a model is repeatedly trained with CT images collected from multiple devices, in which is catastrophic forgetting often occurs, we examine if the performance of our model degrades.
resultsWe show that transfer learning can train a model that does a good job of segmenting muscles with a small number of images. In addition, it was confirmed that VNet shows better performance when comparing the performance of existing semi-automated segmentation tools and other deep learning networks to muscle and liver segmentation tasks. Additionally, we confirmed that VNet is the most robust model to deal with catastrophic forgetting problems.
conclusionIn the 2D CT image segmentation task, we confirmed that the CNN-based network shows better performance than the existing semi-automatic segmentation tool or latest transformer-based networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.