ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Environmental chemical exposures and a machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension in NHANES 2003-2016.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Hypertension: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Interpretable Machine Learning in Heavy Metal-Associated Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease: A Review of Current Methodologies, Toxicological Insights, and Clinical Implications.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Association of the dietary index for gut microbiota with metabolic syndrome and its components combining interpretable machine learning algorithms.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Risk Prediction of Low Bone Density in Elderly Patients with Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms.Balkan medical journal · 2025Article
- Environmental Hypertensionology and the Mosaic Theory of Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension is a common disease, often overlooked in its early stages due to mild symptoms. And persistent elevated blood pressure can lead to adverse outcomes such as coronary heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease. There are many risk factors that lead to hypertension, including various environmental chemicals that humans are exposed to, which are believed to be modifiable risk factors for hypertension.
objectiveTo investigate the role of environmental chemical exposures in predicting hypertension.
methodsA total of 11,039 eligible participants were obtained from NHANES 2003-2016, and multiple imputation was used to process the missing data, resulting in 5 imputed datasets. 8 Machine learning algorithms were applied to the 5 imputed datasets to establish hypertension prediction models, and the average accuracy score, precision score, recall score, and F1 score were calculated. A generalized linear model was also built to predict the systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels.
resultsAll 8 algorithms had good predictions for hypertension, with Support Vector Machine (SVM) being the best, with accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.751, 0.699, 0.717, 0.708 and 0.822, respectively. The R
conclusionsIn this study, relatively accurate prediction of hypertension was achieved using environmental chemicals with machine learning algorithms, demonstrating the predictive value of environmental chemicals for hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.