ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
Predictive model for identification of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis in adults: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Age and Severity of Acute Appendicitis in Adults.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Antibiotic stewardship in non-perforated gangrenous appendicitis: outcomes of single-dose versus postoperative therapy in a retrospective cohort study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Review
- Analysis of predictive factors and development of a nomogram for complicated acute appendicitis in adults.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a risk-stratification model for complicated appendicitis in the elderly: a retrospective comparative study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Low-keV virtual monoenergetic images with rapid kilovoltage-switching DECT for differentiating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis in adults.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- CLR (CRP to Lymphocytes) Score for Differentiating Simple and Complicated Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of the efficacy of carbapenems and cephalosporins for postoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis in children.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Predicting lung metastasis after radical colorectal cancer surgery: a two center retrospective cohort study and nomogram development.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting perforation in the early 24 h of acute appendicitis.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGangrene and perforation are severe complications of acute appendicitis, associated with a higher mortality rate compared to uncomplicated appendicitis. Accurate preoperative identification of Gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (GPA) is crucial for timely surgical intervention.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study includes 796 patients who underwent appendectomy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses are used to develop a nomogram model for predicting GPA based on laboratory tests and computed tomography (CT) findings. The model is validated using an external dataset.
resultsSeven independent predictors were included in the nomogram: white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, D-dimer, serum glucose, albumin, maximum outer diameter of the appendix, and presence of appendiceal fecalith. The nomogram achieved good discrimination and calibration in both the training and testing sets. In the training set, the AUC was 0.806 (95%CI: 0.763-0.849), and the sensitivity and specificity were 82.1% and 66.9%, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good calibration (P = 0.7378). In the testing set, the AUC was 0.799 (95%CI: 0.741-0.856), and the sensitivity and specificity were 70.5% and 75.3%, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed the clinical utility of the nomogram.
conclusionThe laboratory test-CT nomogram model can effectively identify GPA patients, aiding in surgical decision-making and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.