Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385068›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Unveiling Post-COVID-19 syndrome: incidence, biomarkers, and clinical phenotypes in a Thai population.

Sorawat Sangkaew, Hathaitip Tumviriyakul, Chutima Cheranakhorn, Nopporn Songumpai, Nawamin Pinpathomrat, Bunya Seeyankem, Kameelah Yasharad, Palanthorn Loomcharoen, Wisitsak Pakdee, Chanunya Changawej and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sorawat SangkaewDepartment of Social Medicine, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand. sorawat.sa@cpird.in.th.
Hathaitip TumviriyakulDepartment of Social Medicine, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Chutima CheranakhornDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Nopporn SongumpaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Nawamin PinpathomratDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Bunya SeeyankemDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Kameelah YasharadOffice of Disease Prevention and Control Region 12, Songkhla, Thailand.
Palanthorn LoomcharoenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Wisitsak PakdeeDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Chanunya ChangawejDepartment of Nursing, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Dararat DumrongkullachartDepartment of Nursing, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Amornrat LimhengDepartment of Community Nursing, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Ilaria DorigattiMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Medical Research Council MR/X020258/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-COVID- 19 syndrome (PCS) significantly impacts the quality of life of survivors. There is, however, a lack of a standardized approach to PCS diagnosis and management. Our bidirectional cohort study aimed to estimate PCS incidence, identify risk factors and biomarkers, and classify clinical phenotypes for enhanced management to improve patient outcomes.

methodsA bidirectional prospective cohort study was conducted at five medical sites in Hatyai district in Songkhla Province, Thailand. Participants were randomly selected from among the survivors of COVID-19 aged≥18 years between May 15, 2022, and January 31, 2023. The selected participants underwent a scheduled outpatient visit for symptom and health assessments 12 to 16 weeks after the acute onset of infection, during which PCS was diagnosed and blood samples were collected for hematological, inflammatory, and serological tests. PCS was defined according to the World Health Organization criteria. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify biomarkers associated with PCS. Moreover, three clustering methods (agglomerative hierarchical, divisive hierarchical, and K-means clustering) were applied, and internal validation metrics were used to determine clustering and similarities in phenotypes.

findingsA total of 300 survivors were enrolled in the study, 47% of whom developed PCS according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition. In the sampled cohort, 66.3% were females, and 79.4% of them developed PCS (as compared to 54.7% of males, p-value <0.001). Comorbidities were present in 19% (57/300) of all patients, with 11% (18/159) in the group without PCS and 27.7% (39/141) in the group with PCS. The incidence of PCS varied depending on the criteria used and reached 13% when a quality of life indicator was added to the WHO definition. Common PCS symptoms were hair loss (22%) and fatigue (21%), while mental health symptoms were less frequent (insomnia 3%, depression 3%, anxiety 2%). According to our univariate analysis, we found significantly lower hematocrit and IgG levels and greater ALP levels in PCS patients than in patients who did not develop PCS (p-value < 0.05). According to our multivariable analysis, adjusted ALP levels remained a significant predictor of PCS (OR 1.02, p-value= 0.005). Clustering analysis revealed four groups characterized by severe clinical symptoms and mental health concerns (Cluster 1, 4%), moderate physical symptoms with predominant mental health issues (Cluster 2, 9%), moderate mental health issues with predominant physical symptoms (Cluster 3, 14%), and mild to no PCS (Cluster 4, 77%). The quality of life and ALP levels varied across the clusters.

interpretationThis study challenges the prevailing diagnostic criteria for PCS, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that considers quality of life. The identification of ALP as a biomarker associated with PCS suggests that its monitoring could be used for early detection of the onset of PCS. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct clinical phenotypes characterized by different clinical symptoms and mental health concerns that 'exhibited varying impacts on quality of life. This finding suggested that accounting for the reduced quality of life in the definition of PCS could enhance its diagnosis and management and that moving toward personalized interventions could both improve patient outcomes and help reduce medicalization and optimally target the available resources.

fundingThe research publication received funding support from Medical Council of Thailand (Police General Dr. Jongjate Aojanepong Foundation), Hatyai Hospital Charity and Wellcome Trust.

Indexed as

BiomarkersPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRisk FactorsSoutheast Asian PeopleSurvivorsThailandBiomarkersBiomarkersClinical phenotypesCluster analysisDiagnosisLong COVID-19Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39385068
PMCPMC11465487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.