Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385017›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2024

Progress in developing and operationalizing the Monitoring Framework of the Global Biodiversity Framework.

Flavio Affinito, James M Williams, Jillian E Campbell, Maria C Londono, Andrew Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From data to decisions: Toward a Biodiversity Monitoring Standards Framework.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Insects · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Looking back on 2024.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Flavio AffinitoDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. flavio.affinito@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8328-3004
James M WilliamsJoint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
Jillian E CampbellSecretariat of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Maria C LondonoGroup on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2317-5503
Andrew GonzalezDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-8081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The failure to halt the global decline in biodiversity by 2020 contributed to the adoption of the ambitious Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which includes transparency and responsibility as foundations. The Global Biodiversity Framework identifies the actions needed so that societies are living in harmony with nature by 2050. To support the delivery of this ambition, the transparency and responsibility mechanisms defined in the Global Biodiversity Framework include a detailed Monitoring Framework designed to prompt evidence-based actions and track progress towards its goals and targets at the national and global level. The Monitoring Framework includes a set of indicators selected by the Parties through a political process. These indicators have since been operationalized through a scientific process led by an expert group focused on assessing and clarifying their methods. Most indicators are now ready to inform on progress, but key limitations of data availability and methodological challenges remain. The onus is now on the Parties to resource implementation and on the scientific community to support indicator use and development. Implementation of the Monitoring Framework will provide an unprecedented view of the state of biodiversity at the national level, which can be used to assess both national and global progress. Investment to overcome the Monitoring Framework's weaknesses will improve our ability to measure progress and mobilize the actions needed to protect and restore biodiversity and the many benefits we receive from nature.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural Resources

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.