ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction of adverse drug reactions using demographic and non-clinical drug characteristics in FAERS data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early prediction and risk assessment of adverse drug combinations using ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Signal Detection and Personalized Risk Prediction for Cardiovascular Drug Adverse Reactions in Elderly Patients: Real-World Evidence from Western China.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Drug Safety Across the Lifecycle and Decision Type: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A manufacturer-aware cross-system benchmark for pediatric pharmacovigilance signal concordance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of pediatric adverse drug reactions using consensus-derived scarce data.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
- Heterogeneous graph neural network-based prediction of immune-related adverse events.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A disproportionality analysis of cardiac arrhythmia associated with bisphosphonates based on the FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is an ongoing public health concern. While traditional methods to discover ADRs are very costly and limited, it is prudent to predict ADRs through non-invasive methods such as machine learning based on existing data. Although various studies exist regarding ADR prediction using non-clinical data, a process that leverages both demographic and non-clinical data for ADR prediction is missing. In addition, the importance of individual features in ADR prediction has yet to be fully explored. This study aims to develop an ADR prediction model based on demographic and non-clinical data, where we identify the highest contributing factors. We focus our efforts on 30 common and severe ADRs reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2012 and 2023. We have developed a random forest (RF) and deep learning (DL) machine learning model that ingests demographic data (e.g., Age and Gender of patients) and non-clinical data, which includes chemical, molecular, and biological drug characteristics. We successfully unified both demographic and non-clinical data sources within a complete dataset regarding ADR prediction. Model performances were assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the mean average precision (MAP). We demonstrated that our parsimonious models, which include only the top 20 most important features comprising 5 demographic features and 15 non-clinical features (13 molecular and 2 biological), achieve ADR prediction performance comparable to a less practical, feature-rich model consisting of all 2,315 features. Specifically, our models achieved an AUC of 0.611 and 0.674 for RF and DL algorithms, respectively. We hope our research provides researchers and clinicians with valuable insights and facilitates future research designs by identifying top ADR predictors (including demographic information) and practical parsimonious models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.