Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384931›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection among hemodialysis patients using deep neural network methods.

Lihao Xiao, Hanjie Zhang, Juntao Duan, Xiaoran Ma, Len A Usvyat, Peter Kotanko, Yuedong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lihao Xiao *Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Hanjie Zhang *Renal Research Institute, New York, USA.
Juntao Duan *Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Xiaoran MaDepartment of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Len A UsvyatFresenius Medical Care, Waltham, MA, USA.
Peter KotankoRenal Research Institute, New York, USA.
Yuedong WangDepartment of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. yuedong@ucsb.edu.

Funding

Early detection, containment, and management of COVID-19 in dialysis facilities using multi-modal data sourcesR01DK130067 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI GUO, WENSHENG, KOTANKO, PETER · 2021 to 2023
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK130067NIH HHS R01DK130067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has a higher rate of morbidity and mortality among dialysis patients than the general population. Identifying infected patients early with the support of predictive models helps dialysis centers implement concerted procedures (e.g., temperature screenings, universal masking, isolation treatments) to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and mitigate outbreaks. We collect data from multiple sources, including demographics, clinical, treatment, laboratory, vaccination, socioeconomic status, and COVID-19 surveillance. Previous early prediction models, such as logistic regression, SVM, and XGBoost, require sophisticated feature engineering and need improved prediction performance. We create deep learning models, including Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), to predict SARS-CoV-2 infections during incubation. Our study shows deep learning models with minimal feature engineering can identify those infected patients more accurately than previously built models. Our Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model consistently performed well, with an AUC exceeding 0.80, peaking at 0.91 in August 2021. The CNN model also demonstrated strong results with an AUC above 0.75. Both models outperformed previous best XGBoost models by over 0.10 in AUC. Prediction accuracy declined as the pandemic evolved, dropping to approximately 0.75 between September 2021 and January 2022. Maintaining a 20% false positive rate, our LSTM and CNN models identified 66% and 64% of positive cases among patients, significantly outperforming XGBoost models at 42%. We also identify key features for dialysis patients by calculating the gradient of the output with respect to the input features. By closely monitoring these factors, dialysis patients can receive earlier diagnoses and care, leading to less severe outcomes. Our research highlights the effectiveness of deep neural networks in analyzing longitudinal data, especially in predicting COVID-19 infections during the crucial incubation period. These deep network approaches surpass traditional methods relying on aggregated variable means, significantly improving the accurate identification of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerRenal DialysisSARS-CoV-2AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39384931
PMCPMC11464512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.