ArticleScientific reports2024
Investigating the association between osteopenia and bowel perforation through a multicenter radiologic analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anecdotal evidence from preliminary observations has noted multiple instances where osteoporosis is present in elderly patients before the clinical detection of bowel disease, even in the absence of overt gastrointestinal symptoms. However, any potential association between these conditions remains to be further investigated. This computed tomography (CT) study investigates whether patients with gastrointestinal (GI) perforation have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than age and sex matched controls. BMD was measured by drawing 3D regions of interest in the bone marrow of the L1-L3 vertebral bodies on CT scans of each of 37 GI perforations and matched controls. Spectrometric calibration of Hounsfield units to the mineral scale was performed with density measurements in the paravertebral muscles (erector spinae) and subcutaneous adipose tissue. The mean BMD of patients with GI perforation (135.9 ± 24.3 mg/ml) was significantly lower than that of controls (96.9 ± 27.5 mg/ml, p < 0.05). The calculated T-and Z-scores of bone mineral density were also significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05 for each) and were - 2.9 (± 0.90) and - 0.8 (± 0.91) in patients with GI perforation and - 1.6 (± 0.83) and 0 (± 0.96) in the control group, respectively. The results imply that patients with gastrointestinal (GI) perforation have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than age-and sex-matched controls, posing the question whether the screening and aggressive management of osteoporosis is high-risk populations for gastrointestinal perforation can prevent gastrointestinal complications in targeted populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.