Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384833›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

SMGformer: integrating STL and multi-head self-attention in deep learning model for multi-step runoff forecasting.

Wen-Chuan Wang, Miao Gu, Yang-Hao Hong, Xiao-Xue Hu, Hong-Fei Zang, Xiao-Nan Chen, Yan-Guo Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wen-Chuan WangCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China. wangwen1621@163.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-5886
Miao GuCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Yang-Hao HongCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Xiao-Xue HuCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Hong-Fei ZangCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Xiao-Nan ChenChina South-to-North Water Diversion Middle Route Corporation Limited, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yan-Guo JinChina South-to-North Water Diversion Middle Route Corporation Limited, Beijing, 100038, China.

Funding

The support of the special project for collaborative innovation of science and technology in 2021 202121206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate runoff forecasting is of great significance for water resource allocation flood control and disaster reduction. However, due to the inherent strong randomness of runoff sequences, this task faces significant challenges. To address this challenge, this study proposes a new SMGformer runoff forecast model. The model integrates Seasonal and Trend decomposition using Loess (STL), Informer's Encoder layer, Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU), and Multi-head self-attention (MHSA). Firstly, in response to the nonlinear and non-stationary characteristics of the runoff sequence, the STL decomposition is used to extract the runoff sequence's trend, period, and residual terms, and a multi-feature set based on 'sequence-sequence' is constructed as the input of the model, providing a foundation for subsequent models to capture the evolution of runoff. The key features of the input set are then captured using the Informer's Encoder layer. Next, the BiGRU layer is used to learn the temporal information of these features. To further optimize the output of the BiGRU layer, the MHSA mechanism is introduced to emphasize the impact of important information. Finally, accurate runoff forecasting is achieved by transforming the output of the MHSA layer through the Fully connected layer. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed model, monthly runoff data from two hydrological stations in China are selected, and eight models are constructed to compare the performance of the proposed model. The results show that compared with the Informer model, the 1th step MAE of the SMGformer model decreases by 42.2% and 36.6%, respectively; RMSE decreases by 37.9% and 43.6% respectively; NSE increases from 0.936 to 0.975 and from 0.487 to 0.837, respectively. In addition, the KGE of the SMGformer model at the 3th step are 0.960 and 0.805, both of which can maintain above 0.8. Therefore, the model can accurately capture key information in the monthly runoff sequence and extend the effective forecast period of the model.

Indexed as

Bidirectional gated recurrent unitInformerMonthly runoff forecastMulti-head self-attentionMulti-step forecastSeasonal and Trend decomposition using Loess

Identifiers

PMID39384833
PMCPMC11464814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.