Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384831›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Importance estimate of features via analysis of their weight and gradient profile.

Ho Tung Jeremy Chan, Eduardo Veas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ho Tung Jeremy Chan *Interactive System and Data Science, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria. jchan@know-center.at.
Eduardo Veas *Interactive System and Data Science, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie BridgeÖsterreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft FO999888165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding what is important and redundant within data can improve the modelling process of neural networks by reducing unnecessary model complexity, training time and memory storage. This information is however not always priorly available nor trivial to obtain from neural networks. There are existing feature selection methods which utilise the internal working of a neural network for selection, however further analysis and interpretation of the input features' significance is often limiting. We propose an approach that offers an extension that estimates the significance of features by analysing the gradient descent of a pairwise layer within a model. The changes that occur with the weights and gradients throughout training provide a profile that can be used to better understand the importance hierarchy between the features for ranking and feature selection. Additionally, this method is transferable to existing fully or partially trained models, which is beneficial for understanding existing or active models. The proposed approach is demonstrated empirically with a study which uses benchmark datasets from libraries such as MNIST and scikit-feat, as well as a simulated dataset and an applied real world dataset. This is verified with the ground truth where available, and if not, via a comparison of fundamental feature selection methods, which includes existing statistical based and embedded neural network based feature selection methods through the methodology of Reduce and Retrain.

Identifiers

PMID39384831
PMCPMC11464895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.