ArticleScientific reports2024
Distinct copy number signatures between residual benign and transformed areas of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery metabolomics and genetic analysis reveal lipid pathway alterations associated with malignant phenotype acquisition in pleomorphic adenoma and a novel NTF3::ITPR2 fusion in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Evolving Concepts in Salivary Duct Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- Case Report: Carcinoma Ex-Pleomorphic Adenoma With Concurrent Submandibular Gland Lithiasis-A Rare Association With Potential Pathophysiological Implications.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanisms involved with the pathogenesis of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) seem to be associated with the accumulation of molecular alterations in the pleomorphic adenoma (PA). In this sense, using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) a rare series of 27 cases of CXPA and 14 residual PA (rPA) adjacent to the transformation area, we investigated the profile of the copy number alterations (CNAs) comparing benign residual and transformed areas. The main findings were correlated with the histopathological classification by histologic subtype and degree of invasion. The distribution of losses (p = 0.187) and amplifications (p = 0.172) was not statistically different between rPA and CXPA. The number of gains was increased in the transformed areas compared to the benign residual areas (p = 0.005). PLAG1 gain was maintained along the malignant transformation, as it was observed in both residual PA and CXPA samples, likely being an earlier event during transformation. The amplification of GRB7 and ERBB2 may also be an initial step in the malignant transformation of PA to CXPA (salivary duct carcinoma subtype). Furthermore, the amplification of HMGA2 and RPSAP52 were the most prevalent alterations among the studied samples. It was noteworthy that amplified genes in the transformed areas of the tumors were enriched for biological processes related to immune signaling. In conclusion, our results underscored for the first-time crucial CNAs in CXPA, some of them shared with the residual benign area adjacent to the transformation site. These CNAs included PLAG1 gain, as well as amplification of GRB7, ERBB2, HMGA2, and RPSAP52.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.