Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384820›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Integrating Kalman filter noise residue into U-Net for robust image denoising: the KU-Net model.

S Soniya, K C Sriharipriya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S SoniyaSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, 632014, India.
K C SriharipriyaSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, 632014, India. sriharipriya.kc@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In low-level image processing, where the main goal is to reconstruct a clean image from a noise-corrupted version, image denoising continues to be a critical challenge. Although recent developments have led to the introduction of complex architectures to improve denoising performance, these models frequently have more parameters and higher computational demands. Here, we propose a new, simplified architecture called KU-Net, which is intended to achieve better denoising performance while requiring less complexity. KU-Net is an extension of the basic U-Net architecture that incorporates gradient information and noise residue from a Kalman filter. The network's ability to learn is improved by this deliberate incorporation, which also helps it better preserve minute details in the denoised images. Without using Image augmentation, the proposed model is trained on a limited dataset to show its resilience in restricted training settings. Three essential inputs are processed by the architecture: gradient estimations, the predicted noisy image, and the original noisy grey image. These inputs work together to steer the U-Net's encoding and decoding stages to generate high-quality denoised outputs. According to our experimental results, KU-Net performs better than traditional models, as demonstrated by its superiority on common metrics like the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR). KU-Net notably attains a PSNR of 26.60 dB at a noise level of 50, highlighting its efficacy and potential for more widespread use in image denoising.

Indexed as

Gradient estimationImage denoisingKalman filterKU-NetU-Net

Identifiers

PMID39384820
PMCPMC11464703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.