ArticleScientific reports2024
Topic selection for text classification using ensemble topic modeling with grouping, scoring, and modeling approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
TextNetTopics (Yousef et al. in Front Genet 13:893378, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.893378 ) is a recently developed approach that performs text classification-based topics (a topic is a group of terms or words) extracted from a Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling as features rather than individual words. Following this approach enables TextNetTopics to fulfill dimensionality reduction while preserving and embedding more thematic and semantic information into the text document representations. In this article, we introduced a novel approach, the Ensemble Topic Model for Topic Selection (ENTM-TS), an advancement of TextNetTopics. ENTM-TS integrates multiple topic models using the Grouping, Scoring, and Modeling approach, thereby mitigating the performance variability introduced by employing individual topic modeling methods within TextNetTopics. Additionally, we performed a thorough comparative study to evaluate TextNetTopics' performance using eleven state-of-the-art topic modeling algorithms. We used the extracted topics for each as input to the G component in the TextNetTopics tool to select the most compelling topic model regarding their predictive behavior for text classification. We conducted our comprehensive evaluation utilizing the Drug-Induced Liver Injury textual dataset from the CAMDA community and the WOS-5736 dataset. The experimental results show that the Latent Semantic Indexing provides comparable performance measures with fewer discriminative features when compared with other topic modeling methods. Moreover, our evaluation reveals that the performance of ENTM-TS surpasses or aligns with the optimal outcomes obtained from individual topic models across the two datasets, establishing it as a robust and effective enhancement in text classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.