Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384790›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2024

Exploring consumer acceptability of leafy greens in earth and space immersive environments using biometrics.

Claudia Gonzalez Viejo, Natalie Harris, Eden Tongson, Sigfredo Fuentes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claudia Gonzalez ViejoDigital Agriculture, Food and Wine Research Group. Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. cgonzalez2@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-9307
Natalie HarrisDigital Agriculture, Food and Wine Research Group. Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5007-4225
Eden TongsonDigital Agriculture, Food and Wine Research Group. Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Sigfredo FuentesDigital Agriculture, Food and Wine Research Group. Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel research on food perception is required for long-term space exploration. There is limited research on food/beverage sensory analysis in space and space-simulated conditions, with many studies presenting biases in sensory and statistical methods. This study used univariate and multivariate analysis on data from pick-and-eat leafy greens to assess self-reported and biometric consumer sensory analysis in simulated microgravity using reclining chairs and space-immersive environments. According to ANOVA (p < 0.05), there were significant differences between interaction room × position for head movements; besides, there were non-significant differences in the interaction samples × environment. On the other hand, there were significant differences in the sample×position interaction for all liking attributes. Results from multivariate analysis showed effects on self-reported, physiological, and emotional responses of samples in space-related positions and environments related to sensory perception changes. Non-invasive biometrics could offer a powerful tool for developing digital twins to assess genetically modified plants and plant-based food/beverages for long-term space exploration.

Identifiers

PMID39384790
PMCPMC11464502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.