Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384755›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Gross movement counting of fetuses conceived with assisted reproductive technology using a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder.

Eiji Ryo, Keita Yatsuki, Hideo Kamata, Miki Matsuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eiji RyoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan. yonchi@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-5234
Keita YatsukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.
Hideo KamataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.
Miki MatsukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22K09627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) affects gross fetal movement. A prospective cohort study. 65 women who conceived with ART (ART group) and 211 women (control group) without ART recorded fetal movement with the fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder at night weekly after 28 weeks. The number ratio of 10 s epochs with fetal movement to all epochs was calculated as the fetal movement parameter. When no fetal movement was observed for more than 5 min, it was defined as a no fetal movement period, and the average number per hour, the average duration, and the longest duration of the no fetal movement periods were calculated as the no fetal movement parameters. Gestational weeks were classified into 28-33 and 34-39 weeks, and the fetal movement parameter and the no fetal movement parameters were compared using the Student's t-test. The fetal movement parameters at 28-33 weeks were 17.43% (ART) and 16.58% (control) (p = 0.219), and those at 34-39 weeks were 11.72% (ART) and 11.96% (control) (p = 0.590). In the same way, for the no fetal movement parameters, the average numbers were 1.58 and 1.63 per hour (p = 0.357), and 2.36 and 2.30 per hour (p = 0.503). The average durations were 8.30 and 8.46 min (p = 0.712), and 9.20 and 9.51 min (p = 0.188). The longest durations were 16.26 and 17.02 min (p = 0.295), and 22.34 and 22.87 min (p = 0.534). ART does not affect gross fetal movement count.

Indexed as

Fetal MovementReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultFemaleFetal MonitoringFetusGestational AgeHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesAssisted reproductive technologyFetal developmentFetal movementFetal movement acceleration measurement recorderIn vitro fertilization

Identifiers

PMID39384755
PMCPMC11464511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.