ArticleNature communications2024
Harmonize rules for digital sequence information benefit-sharing across UN frameworks.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- How can biological databases support the new UN mechanism for benefit-sharing from digital sequence information?Scientific data · 2026Article
- The PABS system under the pandemic agreement: Current status, controversies in negotiations, and future trends.Biosafety and health · 2026Article
- Policy Briefing: from access to use-untangling the international legal frameworks that govern microbial resources.Sustainable microbiology · 2026Article
- From frameworks to finance: how sharing benefits from the use of digital sequence information can evolve to contribute to biodiversity conservation.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- The LISTEN principles for genetic sequence data governance and database engineering.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Citizen consensus and diverging views on benefit-sharing for genetic resources.npj biodiversity · 2025Review
- Indigenizing fungal biotechnology for planetary health: an opinion paper.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Navigating COP16's digital sequence information outcomes: What researchers need to do in practice.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.