ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2024
Doctor and patient perceptions of sarcopenia in community-based primary care clinics: a questionnaire survey.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Sarcopenia Disease Risk Perception Scale among Turkish older adults.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Sarcopenia: From Global Consensus to Korean Implementation - A Narrative Review and Standpoint.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2026Review
- Quality and reliability of sarcopenia-related videos on BiliBili and TikTok: a cross-sectional content analysis study.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOur study aims to examine perceptions of sarcopenia among doctors and patients for improved management strategies in the future.
methodsWe analyzed nine matched items from separate surveys involving 80 community-based primary care doctors, recruited online (55%) and offline (45%), and 80 community-dwelling older patients who visited 6 of the 80 primary care clinics in South Korea.
resultsDoctors had a mean age of 58.3 ± 9.1 years, with 17.5% women; patients had a mean age of 74.1 ± 6.1 years, with 61.3% women. Twenty-eight patients (35.4%) had heard of sarcopenia, while only 19 doctors (23.8%) knew the diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia. Patients were more likely to believe they had sarcopenia than doctors assumed their patients had sarcopenia (patients, 35%; doctors, 16.9%; P = 0.0039). Patients desired more exercise and nutritional education than doctors reported they could provide (all P < 0.01). More patients preferred regular text messages for exercise or nutritional education (for exercise: patients 16.5%, doctors 5.8%, P = 0.0428; for nutrition: patients 17.1%, doctors 4.4%, P = 0.0154). Many patients were unaware of available community services for sarcopenia management (patients 48.8%, doctors 10.0%, P < 0.001).
conclusionBoth patients and doctors in community-based primary care clinics lacked awareness of sarcopenia. Significant discrepancies existed between the exercise and nutritional education patients desired and what doctors could provide. These findings can inform the development of sarcopenia management programs in primary care clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39384728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.