Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384713›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Environmental impact of intravenous versus oral administration materials for acetaminophen and ketoprofen in a French university hospital: an eco-audit study using a life cycle analysis.

Lionel Bouvet, Manon Juif-Clément, Valentine Bréant, Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Minh-Quyen Lê, Pierre-Jean Cottinet

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Choosing Wisely Canada climate-conscious recommendations for critical care medicine.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. It is time to consider the climate crisis in haematology.Clinical hematology international · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lionel BouvetDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Femme Mère Enfant Hospital, Bron, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France. lionel.bouvet@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5900-4194
Manon Juif-ClémentDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Femme Mère Enfant Hospital, Bron, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Valentine BréantDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Femme Mère Enfant Hospital, Bron, France.
Laurent ZieleskiewiczDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Minh-Quyen LêUniversity of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Pierre-Jean CottinetUniversity of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe combination of acetaminophen with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug is the cornerstone of perioperative multimodal analgesia. These drugs can be administered intravenously or orally as premedication, consistent with the concept of pre-emptive and preventive analgesia. We aimed to assess the environmental impact of their intravenous and oral administration in a French university hospital.

methodsWe carried out a life cycle assessment to determine the amount of greenhouse gas emissions and depletion of water resources resulting from the oral vs intravenous administration of 1 g acetaminophen and 50 mg ketoprofen. We assessed two schemes of intravenous administration, depending on the use of the same or a different infusion set for each drug.

resultsAt our centre, the intravenous administration of both drugs was associated with the emission of 444-556 g CO

conclusionThis eco-audit indicates that oral administration of acetaminophen and ketoprofen results in significantly lower carbon emissions and water consumption than intravenous administration. These findings highlight the importance of using the oral route for most patients, limiting intravenous administration for those with specific needs because of higher environmental impact and cost.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAdministration, IntravenousAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHospitals, UniversityKetoprofenAdministration, OralAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticFranceGreenhouse GasesHumansAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalGreenhouse GasesKetoprofenanalgesicscarbon footprinteco-design of caresustainable health carewater waste

Identifiers

PMID39384713
PMCPMC11602780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.