ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with obstructive uropathy attributable to bladder outlet obstruction.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate outcomes of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in individuals presenting with obstructive-uropathy (OU) attributable to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent HoLEP from August 2017 to January 2023 at our institution. We identified patients with preoperative OU defined by presence of chronic hydronephrosis suggestive of BOO and conducted a matched-pair analysis (1:2) with patients undergoing HoLEP without OU. Patients' demographic, perioperative and postoperative voiding parameters, serum creatinine level, and complications were analyzed up to one-year of follow-up.
resultsPreoperative OU was present in 42 patients. Demographic and preoperative parameters were comparable except median preoperative creatinine (1.245 vs. 1.065 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and catheterization rates (76.2% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) were higher in the OU group. The mean duration of postoperative catheterization was longer in the OU group (3.83 vs. 2.26 days, p = 0.048). Two patients in the OU group developed postoperative acute kidney injury. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications, improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score and maximum urinary flow amongst both groups except a higher post-void residual volume at 3- and 12-months (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively) in OU patients. Patients noted significant improvement in serum creatinine level at 6-12 weeks postoperatively from peak baseline level (P = 0.002).
conclusionHoLEP is effective and safe in patients with OU suggestive of BOO, though they are at higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39384639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.