Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384605›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Invited Response on: "Letter to the Editor: Neuromodulators Raising Eyebrows: Having Is Not So Pleasing, After All, As Wanting".

Cristian Di Gesto, Amanda Nerini, Camilla Matera

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristian Di GestoDepartment of Education, Languages, Interculture, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi, 12-Pad. 26, 50135, Florence, Italy. cristian.digesto@unifi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-5025
Amanda NeriniDepartment of Education, Languages, Interculture, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi, 12-Pad. 26, 50135, Florence, Italy.
Camilla MateraDepartment of Education, Languages, Interculture, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi, 12-Pad. 26, 50135, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This response letter emphasizes the relevance of adopting a psychosocial approach for cosmetic surgeons, particularly concerning the impact of social media on the acceptance of cosmetic surgery among both women and men. Special attention has been directed toward social phenomena that appear to contribute to the formation and maintenance of positive attitudes toward aesthetic surgery and its normalization, including Snapchat Dysmorphia, the Angelina Jolie Effect, and the Mirror Effect, the Exposure Bias. Furthermore, this response letter highlights the critical importance of comprehensive aesthetic education and appropriate training for professionals in the field of cosmetic procedures, especially regarding the topic of body image.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Body ImageCosmetic TechniquesEyebrowsNeurotransmitter AgentsSurgery, PlasticEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleSocial MediaNeurotransmitter AgentsAcceptance of cosmetic surgeryBody imagePsychosocial factorsSocial network sitesWomen and men

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.