Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384601›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Joint hybrid recursive feature elimination based channel selection and ResGCN for cross session MI recognition.

Duan Li, Keyun Li, Yongquan Xia, Jianhua Dong, Ronglei Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Duan LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Keyun LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yongquan XiaSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. xiayongquan@zzuli.edu.cn.
Jianhua DongSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ronglei LuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motor imagery (MI), multi-channel electroencephalography (EEG) data is commonly utilized for MI task recognition to achieve sensory compensation or precise human-computer interaction. However, individual physiological differences, environmental variations, or redundant information and noise in certain channels can pose challenges and impact the performance of BCI systems. In this study, we introduce a channel selection method utilizing Hybrid-Recursive Feature Elimination (H-RFE) combined with residual graph neural networks for MI recognition. This channel selection method employs a recursive feature elimination strategy and integrates three classification methods, namely random forest, gradient boosting, and logistic regression, as evaluators for adaptive channel selection tailored to specific subjects. To fully exploit the spatiotemporal information of multi-channel EEG, this study employed a graph neural network embedded with residual blocks to achieve precise recognition of motor imagery. We conducted algorithm testing using the SHU dataset and the PhysioNet dataset. Experimental results show that on the SHU dataset, utilizing 73.44% of the total channels, the cross-session MI recognition accuracy is 90.03%. Similarly, in the PhysioNet dataset, using 72.5% of the channel data, the classification result also reaches 93.99%. Compared to traditional strategies such as selecting three specific channels, correlation-based channel selection, mutual information-based channel selection, and adaptive channel selection based on Pearson coefficients and spatial positions, the proposed method improved classification accuracy by 34.64%, 10.8%, 3.25% and 2.88% on the SHU dataset, and by 46.96%, 5.04%, 5.81% and 2.32% on the PhysioNet dataset, respectively.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyNeural Networks, ComputerBrainHumansImaginationBrain-computer interface (BCI)Channel selectionDeep learningGraph convolutional neural network (GCN)Motor imagery (MI)

Identifiers

PMID39384601
PMCPMC11464737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.