Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384591›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Strangulation].

K Yen, A Tsaklakidis, H P Schlemmer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K YenInstitut für Rechts- und Verkehrsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Vossstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Kathrin.yen@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
A TsaklakidisInstitut für Rechts- und Verkehrsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Vossstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
H P SchlemmerDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Abteilung Radiologie, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical problemDetection of manual strangulation, choking and hanging, as well as the intensity of these actions, helps to clarify the course of events, to enforce the state's right to prosecute and ultimately to protect against further attacks. However, this is complicated by the scarcity of externally visible findings. STANDARD PROCEDURE TO DATE: The forensic examination of the head and neck after strangulation is carried out by means of external inspection to detect injuries and congestion above the strangulation level. Lesions below the surface of the skin, in particular of the subcutaneous fat tissue, the muscles or the laryngeal structures, usually escape the external inspection. FORENSIC RADIOLOGY AS AN IMPORTANT COMPONENT: Imaging techniques allow internal injuries to be recorded and objectified, which can be of considerable added value in the collection of evidence. Since criminal proceedings must meet the highest standards of security, high demands are placed on imaging and diagnosis. ASSESSMENT: Imaging techniques are suitable for detecting and objectifying internal injuries after a person has survived strangulation. However, their excellent reconstruction and visualization capabilities also make them a valuable addition to postmortem examinations. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE: After reported and survived strangulation, choking or hanging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the soft tissues of the neck should be performed as soon as possible, and if cerebral damage is suspected, the skull should also be examined. If the event was not survived, whole-body computed tomography (CT) is now standard practice at many forensic medicine institutes.

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionAsphyxiaNeck InjuriesForensic MedicineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedForensic medicineHangingManual strangulationPostmortem computed tomographyPostmortem magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.