Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384589›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2025

ESR Essentials: staging and restaging with FDG-PET/CT in oncology-practice recommendations by the European Society for Hybrid, Molecular and Translational Imaging.

Ricarda Ebner, Gabriel T Sheikh, Matthias Brendel, Jens Ricke, Clemens C Cyran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic value of [BMC medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Innovative imaging techniques for urothelial carcinoma].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. FDG PET Hybrid Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricarda EbnerDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. ricarda.ebner@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0851-0094
Gabriel T SheikhDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias BrendelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Clemens C CyranDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) stands as the paramount clinical molecular imaging modality, especially in oncology. Unlike conventional anatomical-morphological imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PET provides detailed visualizations of internal activity at the molecular and cellular levels. 18-fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ([

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyEuropeHumansMedical OncologyPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiopharmaceuticalsSocieties, MedicalTranslational Research, BiomedicalFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsClinical decision-makingFluorodeoxyglucose F18Molecular imagingPositron-emission tomography computed tomographyRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID39384589
PMCPMC11914360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.