[Intramedullary nailing of coated and uncoated nails in infected tibial pseudarthrosis : Results of a retrospective examination of 56 patients].

backgroundIn surgery for sepsis it is a well-established principle that no internal osteosynthetic material should be implanted in cases of chronic osteomyelitis. Therefore, the surgical treatment with intramedullary nails is so far used only rarely in cases of chronic osteomyelitis.

objectiveThis study analyzed whether the implantation of tibial intramedullary nails is an effective treatment for chronic osteomyelitis and how high is the rate of reinfection. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of patients with an infected pseudarthrosis of the tibia in whom a gentamycin-coated nail (ETN) or an uncoated tibial intramedullary nail (UCN) was implanted between December 2011 and December 2019 was carried out. The preoperative, perioperative and postoperative results were evaluated.

resultsDuring the study period 29 patients received a UCN and 27 patients received an ETN. Of the patients 95% (n = 53) had been previously unsuccessfully treated with external fixation. Postoperative complications occurred in 45% of the patients and more often in the ETN group (48% vs. 41%). Reexacerbation of the infection occurred in 20 patients and more frequently in the UCN group (38% vs. 33%). The nonunion already showed a bony consolidation at the time of the exacerbation in 10 patients (50%). At the end of the follow-up a consolidation was present in 48 patients (86%), more frequently in the UCN group (90% vs. 78%). Of the patients 50 (89%) reached full weight bearing without any differences between the groups.

conclusionDespite a relatively high a rate of postoperative complications the risk of reinfection was acceptable with good functional and radiological results. The main general advantages of nailing are without doubt the high primary stability, the implantation with preservation of the soft tissue and the improved wearing comfort for patients.