ArticleScientific reports2024
Online reviews explain differences in coastal and inland tourists' satisfaction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To achieve a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing tourist satisfaction, there has recently been an increasing interest in the information provided by online reviews. In this regard, a rather unexplored issue concerns the causal relationship between topics and emotions expressed by consumers in the written text and their overall quality assessment given through a rating system. This study aims to contribute to filling this gap by investigating whether there are differences between coastal and inland Sardinian hotels in the topics and emotions expressed by online reviewers and how both affect customer satisfaction. To this end, we apply the new TOBIAS method which models the impact of topics, moods, and emotions contained in reviews on the level of satisfaction expressed by customers through the number of stars. The novelty of this method is that it combines natural language processing and causal inference to explain the customer's overall quality rating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.