ArticleKidney research and clinical practice2025
Investigation of current clinical practices and perceptions of patients and caregivers regarding Alport syndrome in South Korea.
Article in Kidney research and clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical practice recommendations for the management of Alport syndrome: a joint statement of the Korean Society of Nephrology and the Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- Disaster preparedness and awareness among medical staff in Korean dialysis units.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlport syndrome (AS) is a highly prevalent inherited kidney disease. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial for improved kidney outcomes. This study evaluated awareness among Korean clinicians about AS and assessed the understanding of AS patients and caregivers.
methodsAn online survey targeting registered members of the Korean Society of Nephrology, the Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology, AS patients, and their caregivers was conducted from January to April 2023.
resultsOut of 103 respondents, most had treated fewer than 10 AS patients. For certain kidney diseases, such as chronic kidney disease of unknown origin and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, half or fewer considered AS as a potential diagnosis. Only half preferred immediate confirmation tests for suspected AS. Genetic testing was available at half of the medical centers, and fewer than half of the adult nephrologists considered genetic testing to be essential. While all the surveyed nephrologists would prescribe renin-angiotensin system blockade, the majority hesitated to initiate treatment. Vigilant genetic testing for donor candidates was not a common practice. While 80% of patients and 50% of caregivers understood the nature and prognosis of AS, they regretted the delayed diagnoses, insufficient explanations, and the absence of support groups.
conclusionNot rarely, AS patients may have been unrecognized as AS. Despite the noteworthy advancement of AS, the recent guidelines have not been widely adopted in clinical practice in Korea. Considering the challenges in Korea, there is an urgent need for locally tailored clinical practice recommendations and a dedicated registry to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.