ArticleKidney research and clinical practice2026
Impact of hemodialysis center accreditation on patient mortality: Korean nationwide cohort study.
Article in Kidney research and clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince hemodialysis (HD) patients are prone to various complications and high mortality, they need to be treated in HD units with professional personnel, proper equipment, and facilities. The Korean Society of Nephrology has been conducting an HD unit accreditation program since 2016. This study was performed to evaluate whether a qualified dialysis center (QDC) reduced the mortality of HD patients.
methodsThis longitudinal, observational cohort study included 31,227 HD from 832 facilities. HD units were classified into two groups: the hospitals that have been certified as QDC between 2016 and 2018 (n = 219) and hospitals that have never been certified as QDC (non-QDC, n = 613). Baseline characteristics and patient mortality were compared between QDC vs. non-QDC groups using Korean HD quality assessment data from 2018. Multivariate logistic regression and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare patient mortality between the two groups.
resultsAmong study subjects, 30.6% of patients were treated at QDC and 69.4% were treated at non-QDC. The patients in the QDC were younger and had a longer dialysis duration, lower serum phosphorus and calcium levels, and higher hemoglobin and single-pool Kt/V levels compared to the patients from the non-QDC group. After adjusting for demographic and clinical parameters, QCD independently reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.897; 95% confidence interval, 0.847-0.950; p < 0.001).
conclusionThe HD unit accreditation program may reduce the risk of death among patients undergoing HD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.