ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2024
Exploration of preferences among people with COPD to inform resource allocation: a discrete choice experiment study.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using the Socio-Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) approach to support chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management resource allocation in integrated care systems in England.Research in health services & regions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTreatment options for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are numerous but adherence remains a key challenge. We performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) of patients' preferences in accessing care for the management of COPD. The aim of this study was to understand patients' preferences for modes of accessing care for the management of COPD. This piece of work was then used to inform resource allocation decisions in five integrated care systems (ICSs) in England.
methodsPeople with diagnosed COPD in five ICSs were invited to complete an online survey from August to September 2022. An experimental design built on the principles of minimal overlap, level balance and orthogonality was used to create 20 sets of 11 scenarios for participants to assess. Participants were presented with three hypothetical options and asked to select their most preferred or state that none was preferred. Data were analysed using a hierarchal Bayes algorithm.
resultsOf 82 639 patients with COPD in the study area, 520 completed the survey. The mean health-related quality of life score derived using EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level was 0.57 (0.29). The attributes assigned greatest importance were treatment outcomes, treatment delivery and the type of staff who deliver treatment. Mean utility level scores were substantially higher for little relief (22.75 (SD 78.80)) or some relief from symptoms (20.67 (46.77)) than for complete relief (‒43.42 (83.03)). Of the treatment delivery options, in-person individual appointments were preferred (mean utility score 48.34 (SD 48.14)), and care being provided by healthcare professionals was viewed as very important (77.50 (64.39)).
conclusionsThe DCE approach can help resource allocation decisions by indicating attributes most important to patients and trade-offs they are willing to make in treatment access and delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.