Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384301›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2024

Twinning Partnership Network: A Learning and Experience-Sharing Network Among Health Professionals in Rwanda to Improve Health Services.

Celestin Gasana, R Taylor Williamson, Ursin Bayisenge, Jean Claude Rukundo, Modeste Gashayija, Edward Kamuhangire, Corneille Ntihabose, Joy Atwine, Theophile Nsengiyumva, Solange Hakiba and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Celestin GasanaCARE Canada; formerly of RTI International, Winnipeg, Canada. cgasana04@gmail.com.
R Taylor WilliamsonAbt Global; formerly of RTI International, Rockville, MD, USA.
Ursin BayisengeIndependent Consultant/RTI International, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean Claude RukundoIndependent Consultant/RTI International, Kigali, Rwanda.
Modeste GashayijaMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Edward KamuhangireMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Corneille NtihaboseMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Joy AtwineManagement Sciences for Health; formerly of Palladium, Kigali, Rwanda.
Theophile NsengiyumvaIndependent consultant; formerly of Palladium, Kigali, Rwanda.
Solange HakibaPalladium, Kigali, Rwanda.
Bienvenu NiyongaboManagement Sciences for Health; formerly of Palladium, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a novel twinning approach: the Twinning Partnership Network (TPN). Twinning is a well-known approach to peer learning that has been used in a variety of settings to build organizational capacity. Although twinning takes many forms, the heart of the approach is that institutions with shared characteristics collaborate via sharing information and experiences to achieve a specific goal. We adapted a twinning partnership strategy developed by the World Health Organization to create a network of like-minded health institutions. The key innovation of the TPN is the network, which ensures that an institution always has a high-performing peer with whom to partner on a specific topic area of interest. We identified 10 hospitals and 30 districts in Rwanda to participate in the TPN. These districts and hospitals participated in a kickoff workshop in which they identified capacity gaps, clarified goals, and selected twinning partners. After the workshop, districts and hospitals participated in exchange visits, coaching visits, and virtual and in-person learning events. We found that districts and hospitals that selected specific areas and worked on them throughout the duration of the TPN with their peers improved their performance significantly when compared with those that selected and worked on other areas. Accreditation scores improved by 5.6% more in hospitals selecting accreditation than those that did not. Districts that selected improving community-based health insurance coverage improved by 4.8% more than districts that did not select this topic area. We hypothesize that these results are due to senior management's interest and motivation to improve in these specific areas, the motivation gained by learning from high-performing peers with similar resources, and context-specific knowledge sharing from peer hospitals and districts.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelCapacity BuildingCooperative BehaviorHumansPeer GroupQuality ImprovementRwanda

Identifiers

PMID39384301
PMCPMC11521555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.