ArticleBMJ open2024
Costs and resource distribution of direct services for HIV in Uganda.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Economic burden of depressive disorders and HIV for people living with HIV in Uganda.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn high HIV-burden countries like Uganda, financing and resource allocation for HIV services have rapidly evolved. This study aimed to employ time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to examine the allocation of resources and associated costs for HIV care throughout the country.
designA cross-sectional study.
settingThis study was conducted at 31 health facilities throughout Uganda: 16 level III health centres, 10 level IV health centres and 5 district hospitals.
participants1119 persons receiving HIV services in 2020.
methodsWe conducted TDABC to quantify costs, resource consumption and duration of service provision associated with antiretroviral therapy, prevention of mother-to-child transmission, HIV counselling and testing (HCT), voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) and pre-exposure prophylaxis. We also quantified disparities in resource consumption according to client-level and facility-level characteristics to examine equity. Fixed-effects multivariable regression analyses were employed to inspect factors associated with service costs and provider-client interaction time.
resultsThe mean cost of services ranged from US$8.18 per visit for HCT to US$32.28 for VMMC. In terms of disparities, those in the Western region received more provider time during visits compared with other regions (35 more minutes, p<0.001); and those receiving care at private facilities received more provider time compared with public facilities (13 more minutes, p=0.02); and those at level IV health centres received more time compared with those at level III (12 more minutes, p=0.01). Absent consumables, services for older adults (US$2.28 higher, p=0.02), those with comorbidities (US$1.44 higher, p<0.001) and those living in the Western region (US$2.88 higher, p<0.001) were more expensive compared with younger adults, those without comorbidities and those in other regions, respectively. Inclusive of consumables, services were higher-cost for individuals in wealthier households (US$0.83 higher, p=0.03) and those visiting level IV health centres (US$3.41 higher, p=0.006) compared with level III.
conclusionsCosts and resources for HIV care vary widely throughout Uganda. This variation requires careful consideration: some sources of variation may be indicative of vertical and horizontal equity within the health system, while others may be suggestive of inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.