SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2024
Age Is a Key Factor Influencing the Choice of Treatment for Primary Patellar Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recurrent patellar dislocation: treatments and challenges.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary patellar dislocation has a certain recurrence rate after either conservative or surgical treatment, and the optimal treatment for patients with primary patellar dislocation of different ages remains unclear. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of surgical and conservative treatments for primary patellar dislocation across different age groups. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist, we conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials of primary patellar dislocation treated surgically or conservatively up to January 2023. Data searching, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were carried out in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A total of nine studies with 433 patients were included in our study. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment modalities in terms of Kujala score, pain score, patient satisfaction, reoperation, and Tegner score. The rate of re-dislocation after surgical treatment is lower than that after conservative treatment. Subgroup analysis based on mean age showed that when the age was >20 years, Kujala scores were higher after surgical treatment than after conservative treatment (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.41-21.30). When the age was ≤20 years, the difference in Kujala scores between the two treatment modalities was not statistically significant. When the age was >20 years, the recurrence rate of patellar dislocation was lower after surgical treatment than after conservative treatment (p = 0.009, 95% CI = 0.08-0.70). When the age was ≤20 years, the difference in the recurrence rate of patellar dislocation between the two treatment modalities was not statistically significant. When the age of patients with primary patellar dislocation is ≤20 years, both surgical and conservative treatments result in similar clinical outcomes. When the age is >20 years, better clinical outcomes can be achieved by opting for surgical treatment. Therefore, surgery may be a better option for patients with primary patellar dislocation whose age is >20 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.