Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383873›Full record

ReviewCell reports. Medicine2024

The penetration of therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier: Classic case studies and clinical implications.

William A Banks, Elizabeth M Rhea, May J Reed, Michelle A Erickson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell reports. Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The neuroimmune-glutamate hypothesis of addiction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Design of bifunctional pyridinophane ligands as MnInorganic chemistry frontiers · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Efavirenz-Altered Gut-Microbiota,International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pleiotropic Effects of 3-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William A BanksGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. Electronic address: wabanks1@uw.edu.
Elizabeth M RheaGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
May J ReedGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Michelle A EricksonGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

Funding

Amyloid Beta and Collagen IV Interactions in the Brain Microvasculature in Alzheimers DiseaseR01AG087226 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAY J REED · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
The Microvasculature in Alzheimer’s Disease: Viable Microvessels for Studies of Brain Endothelial and Glycocalyx HealthR03AG075397 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REED, MAY J · 2022 to 2022
$156k
The Brain Microvasculature, Hyaluronan, and AgingR03AG051071 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REED, MAY J · 2015 to 2016
$155k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG087226NIA NIH HHS R03 AG051071NIA NIH HHS R03 AG075397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) plays central roles in the maintenance and health of the brain. Its mechanisms to safeguard the brain against xenobiotics and endogenous toxins also make the BBB the primary obstacle to the development of drugs for the central nervous system (CNS). Here, we review classic examples of the intersection of clinical medicine, drug delivery, and the BBB. We highlight the role of lipid solubility (heroin), saturable brain-to-blood (efflux: opiates) and blood-to-brain (influx: nutrients, vitamins, and minerals) transport systems, and adsorptive transcytosis (viruses and incretin receptor agonists). We examine how the disruption of the BBB that occurs in certain diseases (tumors) can also be modulated (osmotic agents and microbubbles) and used to deliver treatments, and the role of extracellular pathways in gaining access to the CNS (albumin and antibodies). In summary, this review provides a historical perspective of the key role of the BBB in delivery of drugs to the brain in health and disease.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierDrug Delivery SystemsAnimalsBiological TransportBrainHumans

Identifiers

PMID39383873
PMCPMC11604479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.