Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383523›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Clinical Data Flow in Botswana Clinics: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Assessment.

Grey Faulkenberry, Audrey Masizana, Badisa Mosesane, Kagiso Ndlovu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grey Faulkenberry *Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4327-5402
Audrey Masizana *eHealth Research Unit, Department of Computer Science, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-1946
Badisa Mosesane *Global Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID 0009-0006-4003-0265
Kagiso NdlovuInformatics Division, Sir Ketumile Masire Teaching Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID 0000-0002-4175-8366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBotswana has made significant investments in its health care information infrastructure, including vertical programs for child health and nutrition, HIV care, and tuberculosis. However, effectively integrating the more than 18 systems in place for data collection and reporting has proved to be challenging. The Botswana Health Data Collaborative Roadmap Strategy (2020-24) states that "there exists parallel reporting systems and data is not integrated into the mainstream reports at the national level," seconded by the Botswana National eLearning strategy (2020), which states that "there is inadequate information flow at all levels, proliferation of systems, reporting tools are not synthesized; hence too many systems are not communicating."

objectiveThe objectives of this study are to (1) create a visual representation of how data are processed and the inputs and outputs through each health care system level; (2) understand how frontline workers perceive health care data sharing across existing platforms and the impact of data on health care service delivery.

methodsThe setting included a varied range of 30 health care facilities across Botswana, aiming to capture insights from multiple perspectives into data flow and system integration challenges. The study design combined qualitative and quantitative methodologies, informed by the rapid assessment process and the technology assessment model for resource limited settings. The study used a participatory research approach to ensure comprehensive stakeholder engagement from its inception. Survey instruments were designed to capture the intricacies of data processing, sharing, and integration among health care workers. A purposive sampling strategy was used to ensure a wide representation of participants across different health care roles and settings. Data collection used both digital surveys and in-depth interviews. Preliminary themes for analysis include perceptions of the value of health care data and experiences in data collection and sharing. Ethical approvals were comprehensively obtained, reflecting the commitment to uphold research integrity and participant welfare throughout the study.

resultsThe study recruited almost 44 health care facilities, spanning a variety of health care facilities. Of the 44 recruited facilities, 27 responded to the surveys and participated in the interviews. A total of 75% (112/150) of health care professionals participating came from clinics, 20% (30/150) from hospitals, and 5% (8/150) from health posts and mobile clinics. As of October 10, 2023, the study had collected over 200 quantitative surveys and conducted 90 semistructured interviews.

conclusionsThis study has so far shown enthusiastic engagement from the health care community, underscoring the relevance and necessity of this study's objectives. We believe the methodology, centered around extensive community engagement, is pivotal in capturing a nuanced understanding of the health care data ecosystem. The focus will now shift to the analysis phase of the study, with the aim of developing comprehensive recommendations for improving data flow within Botswana's health care system. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52411.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareBotswanaHumansaccess to informationBotswanachild healthclinical datacommunicationdata flowEHRseLearningelectronic health care recordsglobal healthhealth care informationhealth informaticshealth information interoperabilityhealth information systemsHIVinfantinfantsinteroperabilitymixed methodpediatricpediatricssurveytuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39383523
PMCPMC11514319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.