Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383481›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

How Time, Living Situation, and Stress Related to Technology Influence User Acceptance and Usability of a Socialization Service for Older Adults and Their Formal and Informal Caregivers: Six-Month Pilot Study.

Jasmine Pani, Letizia Lorusso, Lara Toccafondi, Grazia D'Onofrio, Filomena Ciccone, Sergio Russo, Francesco Giuliani, Daniele Sancarlo, Novella Calamida, Gianna Vignani and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jasmine PaniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, Florence, 50139, Italy, 39 0552758663.ORCID 0000-0002-3188-3585
Letizia LorussoSchool of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2058-9284
Lara ToccafondiUmana Persone Development & Research Social Enterprise, Grosseto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-9902
Grazia D'OnofrioClinical Psychology Service, Health Department, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5905-6063
Filomena CicconeClinical Psychology Service, Health Department, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-7757
Sergio RussoInnovation and Research Unit, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8773-8651
Francesco GiulianiInnovation and Research Unit, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-2158
Daniele SancarloGeriatrics Unit, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9541-6364
Novella CalamidaUmana Persone Development & Research Social Enterprise, Grosseto, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-1990-642X
Gianna VignaniUmana Persone Development & Research Social Enterprise, Grosseto, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-1452-1955
Tarmo PihlSentab, Tallin, Estonia.ORCID 0009-0007-9360-3861
Erika RoviniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, Florence, 50139, Italy, 39 0552758663.ORCID 0000-0002-7906-9013
Filippo CavalloDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, Florence, 50139, Italy, 39 0552758663.ORCID 0000-0001-7432-5033
Laura FioriniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, Florence, 50139, Italy, 39 0552758663.ORCID 0000-0001-5784-3752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Considering the growing population of older adults, addressing the influence of loneliness among this demographic group has become imperative, especially due to the link between social isolation and deterioration of mental and physical well-being. Technology has the potential to be used to create innovative solutions to increase socialization and potentially promote healthy aging. Objective: This 6-month study examined the usability and acceptability of a technology-based socialization service and explored how stress and living situation affect older adults' and their ecosystem's perceptions of technology, investigating cross-sectional and longitudinal differences among and across user groups. Methods: Participants were recruited in Tuscany and Apulia (Italy) through a network of social cooperatives and a research hospital, respectively. A total of 20 older adults were provided with the same technology installed on a tablet and on a smart television. The technology has three functionalities: video calling, playing games, and sharing news. Additionally, 20 informal caregivers (IC) and 13 formal caregivers (FC) connected to the older adults were included in the study. After both initial training in the use of the system (T0) and 6 months of using the system (T6), questionnaires on usability, acceptability, and technostress were filled in by older adults, IC, and FC. Nonparametric or parametric tests were conducted to investigate group differences at both time points and changes over time. Additional analyses on older adults were done to assess whether differences in usability and acceptability were related to living situation (ie, alone or with someone). Furthermore, correlation analyses were performed between usability, acceptability, and stress toward technology at T0 and T6. Results: At both T0 and T6, older adults had lower usability scores than IC and FC and higher anxiety than IC. Over time, there was a significant decrease in older adults' attitudes toward technology score, depicting a negative attitude over time (T0 median 4.2, IQR 0.5; T6 median 3.7, IQR 0.8; Cohen d=0.7), while there was no change for IC and FC. At T0, those living alone had lower acceptability than those living with someone but this difference disappeared at T6. People or participants living with someone had a decline in anxiety, attitudes toward technology, enjoyment, and perceived usefulness. Stress toward technology affected usability and acceptability in the older adult group entering the study (ρ=-.85) but this was not observed after 6 months. In the IC group, stress affected trust at T0 (ρ=-.23) but not at T6. Conclusions: At the start of the study, older adults judged the system to be less usable and more stressful than did the caregivers. Indeed, at first, technostress was correlated with usability and acceptability; however, with repeated use, technostress did not influence the perception of technology. Overall, getting accustomed to technology decreased anxiety and stress toward technology.

Indexed as

CaregiversStress, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSocializationSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factorsactive aginglongitudinal studyscaling uptechnology usability and acceptancetechnostress

Identifiers

PMID39383481
PMCPMC11560862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.