Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383385›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2024

Unveiling the hidden threat: investigating gastrointestinal parasites and their costly impact on slaughtered livestock.

Hafiz Muhammad Rizwan, Hafiz Muhammad Zohaib, Muhammad Sohail Sajid, Urfa Bin Tahir, Razia Kausar, Nadia Nazish, Mourad Ben Said, Nimra Anwar, Mahvish Maqbool, Dalia Fouad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hafiz Muhammad RizwanSection of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, KBCMA College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Narowal, Sub campus UVAS, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6048-7610
Hafiz Muhammad ZohaibSection of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, KBCMA College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Narowal, Sub campus UVAS, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohail SajidDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Urfa Bin TahirDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Razia KausarDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Nadia NazishDepartment of Zoology, University of Sialkot, Pakistan.
Mourad Ben SaidLaboratory of Microbiology, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Manouba, Tunisia.
Nimra AnwarDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mahvish MaqboolEastwood Lab, Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, USA.
Dalia FouadDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Farid Shokry AtayaDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in ruminants slaughtered at the abattoir in district Narowal, Punjab, Pakistan. The overall prevalence of parasitic infection was determined to be 72.92% based on faecal examination. Among the ruminant species, goats exhibited a significantly higher (P < 0.05) prevalence of parasitic infection (78.63%) compared to cattle, buffalo, and sheep. Additionally, female ruminants showed a significantly higher (P<0.05) prevalence of infection (85.62%) compared to males (65.13%). The intestines (both small and large) of small and large ruminants were found to be significantly more affected, with a prevalence of 39.58% of parasitic infection compared to other examined organs. A total of ten parasitic genera were identified in ruminants, including hydatid cysts. Ruminants with a high burden of parasites (45.74%) significantly outnumbered those with light (23.40%) and moderate (30.85%) burdens. Economically, the estimated annual losses in Pakistan due to organ condemnation with GI parasites were substantial, amounting to Pak. Rs. 405.09/- million (USD = 1,428,760). These findings underscore the significance of GI parasite infections as a major animal health concern and a cause of significant economic losses in the research area.

Indexed as

AbattoirsIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticAnimalsCattleFemaleGoatsLivestockMalePakistanPrevalenceSheep

Identifiers

PMID39383385
PMCPMC11486462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.