Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383382›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2024

Efficacy of convalescent plasma in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: findings from a controlled trial.

T P Costa, M Aoki, C M Ribeiro, E Socca, L Itinose, R Basso, L Blanes

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T P CostaDiretoria Técnica e Qualidade, Maternidade e Cirurgia Nossa Senhora do Rocio-HR, Campo Largo, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-7444
M AokiLaboratório de Ciência e Tecnologia Aplicada è Saúde, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5166-2897
C M RibeiroInstituto de Pesquisa do Vale da Ciência, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6972-5830
E SoccaInstituto de Pesquisa do Vale da Ciência, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-5114
L ItinoseDiretoria Técnica e Qualidade, Maternidade e Cirurgia Nossa Senhora do Rocio-HR, Campo Largo, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8463-4793
R BassoDiretoria Técnica e Qualidade, Maternidade e Cirurgia Nossa Senhora do Rocio-HR, Campo Largo, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7816-4394
L BlanesLaboratório de Ciência e Tecnologia Aplicada è Saúde, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2929-6696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has driven the search for alternative therapies, including convalescent plasma, historically used in infectious diseases. Despite results in other diseases, its effectiveness against COVID-19 remains uncertain with conflicting results in clinical trials. A pragmatic, single-center, prospective, and open randomized controlled trial was carried out in a hospital in Brazil, with the aim of evaluating the impact of convalescent plasma on the clinical improvement of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale was used to measure clinical improvement, focusing on the reduction in disease severity by up to 2 points, while antibody and C-reactive protein levels were monitored over time. After hospital admission, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive convalescent plasma and standard treatment or to be part of the control group with standard treatment. Follow-up was carried out on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and/or at discharge. From January 14 to April 4, 2022, 38 patients were included, but 3 were excluded due to protocol deviations, resulting in a total of 35 patients: 19 in the control group and 16 in the plasma group. There was no significant difference in clinical improvement between the convalescent plasma group and the control group, nor in secondary outcomes. The study had limitations due to the small number of patients and limited representation of COVID-19 cases. Broader investigations are needed to integrate therapies into medical protocols, both for COVID-19 and other diseases. Conducting randomized studies is challenging due to the complexity of medical conditions and the variety of treatments available.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyHospitalizationImmunization, PassiveSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAntibodies, ViralBrazilC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, ViralC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID39383382
PMCPMC11463911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.