Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383345›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2025

Predicting Response to Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Using an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Pathology Assay: Development and Validation in an International 12-Center Cohort.

Yair Lotan, Viswesh Krishna, Waleed M Abuzeid, Bryn Launer, Sam S Chang, Vrishab Krishna, Siddhant Shingi, Jennifer B Gordetsky, Thomas Gerald, Solomon Woldu and 29 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Editorial Comment.The Journal of urology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Viswesh KrishnaValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Waleed M AbuzeidValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2489-0514
Bryn LaunerDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sam S ChangDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vrishab KrishnaValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Siddhant ShingiValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Jennifer B GordetskyDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Thomas GeraldDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Solomon WolduDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Eugene ShkolyarDepartment of Urology, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Dickon HayneDepartment of Urology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Andrew RedfernDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Lisa SpaldingDepartment of Urology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Courtney StewartDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Eduardo EyzaguirreDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Shamsunnahar ImtiazDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Vikram M NarayanDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Vignesh T PackiamDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Michael A O'DonnellDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Roger LiDepartment of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Loic BaekelandtDepartment of Urology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven JoniauDepartment of Urology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tahlita ZuiverloonDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mario I FernandezDepartment of Urology, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Marcela SchultzDepartment of Pathology, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Patrick J HensleyDepartment of Urology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
Derek AllisonDepartment of Pathology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
John A TaylorDepartment of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Ameer HamzaDepartment of Pathology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Ashish KamatDepartment of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Vivek NimgaonkarValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Snehal SonawaneValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Daniel L MillerValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Drew WatsonValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Damir VrabacValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Anirudh JoshiValar Labs, Palo Alto, California.
Jay B ShahDepartment of Urology, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Stephen B WilliamsDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are few markers to identify those likely to recur or progress after treatment with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). We developed and validated artificial intelligence (AI)-based histologic assays that extract interpretable features from transurethral resection of bladder tumor digitized pathology images to predict risk of recurrence, progression, development of BCG-unresponsive disease, and cystectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsPre-BCG resection-derived whole-slide images and clinical data were obtained for high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer cases treated with BCG from 12 centers and were analyzed through a segmentation and feature extraction pipeline. Features associated with clinical outcomes were defined and tested on independent development and validation cohorts. Cases were classified into high or low risk for recurrence, progression, BCG-unresponsive disease, and cystectomy.

resultsNine hundred forty-four cases (development: 303, validation: 641, median follow-up: 36 months) representative of the intended use population were included (high-grade Ta: 34.1%, high-grade T1: 54.8%; carcinoma in situ only: 11.1%, any carcinoma in situ: 31.4%). In the validation cohort, "high recurrence risk" cases had inferior high-grade recurrence-free survival vs "low recurrence risk" cases (HR, 2.08,

conclusionsWe developed and validated AI-based histologic assays that identify high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer cases at higher risk of recurrence, progression, BCG-unresponsive disease, and cystectomy, potentially aiding clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicArtificial IntelligenceBCG VaccineUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdministration, IntravesicalAgedCystectomyDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG Vaccineartificial intelligencebladder cancerprogressionrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39383345
PMCPMC12674634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.