Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383344›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2025

Adrenaline Auto-Injectors for Preventing Fatal Anaphylaxis.

Marcus Sim, Vibha Sharma, Karen Li, Mary Hazel Gowland, Tomaz Garcez, Cassandra Shilladay, Richard Pumphrey, Nandinee Patel, Paul J Turner, Robert J Boyle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The Gap Between Prescription and Practice: Adrenaline Autoinjector Carriage in an Australian Cohort.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Unusual Causes of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis - A Review.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Adrenaline Auto-Injector Prescribing in Primary Care in England: An Analysis of Non-Standard Dosing.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  8. Early Origins of Asthma and Allergies: Clues From Studies in China.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  9. Alternatives to Injectable Adrenaline for Treating Anaphylaxis.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marcus SimNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vibha SharmaRoyal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Karen LiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mary Hazel GowlandAllergy Action, St Albans, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-5979
Tomaz GarcezResearch and Innovation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Cassandra ShilladayResearch and Innovation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Richard PumphreyDepartment of Immunology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Nandinee PatelNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul J TurnerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9862-5161
Robert J BoyleNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-7580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylaxis affects up to 5% of people during their lifetime. Although anaphylaxis usually resolves without long-term physical consequences, it can result in anxiety and quality of life impairment. Rarely and unpredictably, community anaphylaxis can cause rapid physiological decompensation and death. Adrenaline (epinephrine) is the cornerstone of anaphylaxis treatment, and provision of adrenaline autoinjectors (AAI) has become a standard of care for people at risk of anaphylaxis in the community. In this article, we explore the effectiveness of AAIs for preventing fatal outcomes in anaphylaxis, using information drawn from animal and human in vivo studies and epidemiology. We find that data support the effectiveness of intravenous adrenaline infusions for reversing physiological features of anaphylaxis, typically at doses from 0.05 to 0.5 μg/kg/min for 1-2 h, or ~ 10 μg/kg total dose. Intramuscular injection of doses approximating 10 μg/kg in humans can result in similar peak plasma adrenaline levels to intravenous infusions, at 100-500 pg/mL. However, these levels are typically short-lived following intramuscular adrenaline, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes can be unpredictable. Epidemiological data do not support an association between increasing AAI prescriptions and reduced fatal anaphylaxis, although carriage and activation rates remain low. Taken together, these data suggest that current AAIs have little impact on rates of fatal anaphylaxis, perhaps due to a lack of sustained and sufficient plasma adrenaline concentration. Effects of AAI prescription on quality of life may be variable. There is a need to consider alternatives, which can safely deliver a sustained adrenaline infusion via an appropriate route.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisEpinephrineAnimalsHumansInjections, IntramuscularSelf AdministrationEpinephrineanaphylaxisdrug allergyfood allergypharmacology and pharmacogenomicsvenom and insect allergy

Identifiers

PMID39383344
PMCPMC11707323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.