Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383258›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2024

Investigating the effects of artificial baroreflex stimulation on pain perception: A comparative study in no-pain and chronic low back pain individuals.

Alessandra Venezia, Harriet-Fawsitt Jones, David Hohenschurz-Schmidt, Matteo Mancini, Matthew Howard, Elena Makovac

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Beyond the headache: autonomic reflex dysfunction and heightened sensory sensitivity contribute to orthostatic intolerance in migraine.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandra VeneziaDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-9074-7025
Harriet-Fawsitt JonesDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
David Hohenschurz-SchmidtDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Matteo ManciniDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Matthew HowardDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9359-3057
Elena MakovacDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

EFIC-Grunenthal Award 2019 EFIC-Grunenthal Award 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) and pain exhibit a reciprocal relationship, where acute pain triggers ANS responses, whereas resting ANS activity can influence pain perception. Nociceptive signalling can also be altered by 'top-down' processes occurring in the brain, brainstem and spinal cord, known as 'descending modulation'. By employing the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, we previously revealed a connection between reduced low-frequency heart rate variability and CPM. Individuals with chronic pain often experience both ANS dysregulation and impaired CPM. Baroreceptors, which contribute to blood pressure and heart rate variability regulation, may play a significant role in this relationship, although their involvement in pain perception and their functioning in chronic pain have not been sufficiently explored. In the present study, we combined artificial 'baroreceptor stimulation' in both pressure pain and CPM paradigms, seeking to explore the role of baroreceptors in pain perception and descending modulation. In total, 22 individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and 29 individuals with no-pain (NP) took part in the present study. We identified a differential modulation of baroreceptor stimulation on pressure pain between the groups of NP and CLBP participants. Specifically, NP participants perceived less pain in response to baroreflex activation, whereas CLBP participants exhibited increased pain sensitivity. CPM scores were associated with baseline measures of baroreflex sensitivity in both CLBP and NP participants. Our data support the importance of the baroreflex in chronic pain and a possible mechanism of dysregulation involving the interaction between the ANS and descending pain modulation. KEY POINTS: Baroreflex stimulation has different effects on pressure pain in participants with chronic pain compared to matched individuals with no-pain. Baroreceptor activation decreases pain in participants with no-pain but increases pain perception in participants with chronic pain. Baroreflex sensitivity is associated with conditioned pain modulation in both groups of chronic pain and no-pain participants. The reactivity of the baroreflex during autonomic stress demonstrated a positive correlation with Pain Trait scores in participants with chronic back pain.

Indexed as

BaroreflexChronic PainLow Back PainPain PerceptionAdultBlood PressureFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPressoreceptorsYoung Adultartificial baroreceptor stimulationbaroreceptor sensitivity indexchronic lower back painconditioned pain modulationpressure pain

Identifiers

PMID39383258
PMCPMC11649519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.