ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2024
Posttreatment surveillance intensity and overall survival in prostate cancer survivors (AFT-30).
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPosttreatment surveillance affects millions of cancer survivors, but empiric data to guide clinical practice are lacking. This study assessed whether the intensity of surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer is associated with overall survival.
methodsMen diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2005 and 2010 who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy at a Commission on Cancer-accredited facility were randomly sampled. Primary data collected from 10 147 patients sampled across 1007 facilities were linked with existing data from the National Cancer Database. Analysis examined whether intensity of surveillance measured as the number of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests in the first year after primary treatment (categorized as 0-1 [low intensity], 2 [medium], or ≥3 [high intensity] PSA tests) was associated with overall survival. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and subsequent use of imaging tests, biopsy procedures, and salvage treatment.
resultsMedian follow-up exceeded 8 years from prostate cancer diagnosis. Overall survival was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups among radiation therapy (P = .59) or radical prostatectomy (P = .29) patients. RFS was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups for radiation therapy (P = .13) patients but was for radical prostatectomy (P = .01) patients with high intensity associated with the worst RFS. In both treatments, higher surveillance intensity was associated with more procedures and salvage treatments.
conclusionsIn patients with localized prostate cancer, more frequent PSA surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy was associated with increased procedures and salvage treatments but not overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.